Skip to content

Why I Returned to Oil Painting in the Age of AI

As technology became increasingly capable of creating images for me, I discovered how much I valued creating them myself. This is the story of why I returned to oil painting in the age of artificial intelligence.

Artist Andy Renard standing between AI-generated imagery and traditional oil painting in his studio, illustrating the relationship between technology and creative process.
A composite image combining photography, digital editing and AI-generated imagery. The contrast reflects the journey described in this article—from digital creation back to the physical process of oil painting.

A Childhood Before Screens

I grew up in a world where creativity was almost entirely physical. If you wanted to draw, you picked up a pencil. If you wanted to paint, you used watercolor, oil paint or whatever materials happened to be available. There were no digital tools, no image generators and certainly no artificial intelligence capable of producing images on demand.

Creating something required time, patience and practice. A blank sheet of paper was exactly that: blank. If you wanted to fill it with something meaningful, you had to do the work yourself.

Like many children, I spent countless hours drawing, experimenting and exploring visual ideas. At the time, I had no idea that images would remain a constant thread throughout my life, even as the tools used to create them changed dramatically.

Following the Evolution of Visual Technology

For much of my adult life, I followed technology wherever it went.

When photography moved from film to digital cameras, I embraced the change. When image editing software became increasingly sophisticated, I wanted to learn it. As 3D graphics became more accessible, I explored that world as well. Over the years, I worked with photography, digital imagery, illustration and various forms of visual design.

Every technological leap seemed exciting because it expanded what was possible. Digital photography removed limitations that had existed for decades. Editing software allowed experimentation without risk. Three-dimensional graphics made it possible to build entire worlds inside a computer.

At every stage, technology offered new creative opportunities, and I was fascinated by the possibilities.

Unlike some artists, I have never viewed technology as a threat. On the contrary, I have always been curious about it. I enjoy learning new tools and discovering new ways to create visual experiences. For many years, technological progress felt like an almost entirely positive force.

When Artificial Intelligence Changed the Conversation

The arrival of artificial intelligence was different.

Suddenly, images that once required days or weeks of work could be generated in seconds. Detailed illustrations, fantasy landscapes, portraits and concept art appeared almost instantly. Tasks that previously demanded technical skill and countless hours of effort could now be completed with a few written prompts.

The technology was, and still is, remarkable.

Yet AI forced me to ask a question I had never seriously considered before:

Why do I create?

For years, the conversation had been about what technology could help us achieve. AI shifted the focus. It made me think less about the final image and more about the creative process itself.

The answer surprised me.

I realized that what I valued most was not simply the finished result. It was the act of making something.

The Value of the Process

Photography was never only about the photograph.

It was about driving to a location before sunrise, waiting for the right light and experiencing a landscape as it slowly transformed in front of the camera. Digital illustration was never only about the final image. It was about solving problems, exploring possibilities and gradually bringing an idea into existence.

The process was part of the reward.

When AI suddenly made the destination available almost instantly, I became aware of how much I appreciated the journey. The challenges, the uncertainty and even the mistakes had always been important. They were not obstacles standing between me and the finished work. They were part of the creative experience itself.

That realization changed the way I thought about art.

Returning to Oil Painting

Around this time, I found myself returning to painting.

Not because painting was new, but because it offered something that many modern tools had gradually removed: resistance.

Oil paint demands patience. It dries slowly. Layers take time to develop. Decisions cannot always be undone with a single click. A painting evolves through a dialogue between the artist and the material, and that dialogue often leads to unexpected discoveries.

In a culture increasingly focused on speed, efficiency and instant results, I found something deeply satisfying in a medium that refused to be rushed.

Painting reminded me that not everything valuable needs to happen quickly.

Why Oil Paint Still Matters

There is something uniquely rewarding about standing in front of a canvas and watching a painting emerge over days, weeks or even months.

The surface records every decision. Earlier layers remain hidden beneath later ones, influencing the final image in ways that are often impossible to predict. A painting develops its own history as it grows, and that history becomes part of the finished work.

Some of my paintings begin with a clear idea. Others evolve through experimentation. In both cases, the process remains central. The physical act of applying paint, responding to accidents and making adjustments is not separate from the artwork. It is the artwork.

This is one of the reasons I continue to be drawn to oil painting despite all the technological advances surrounding us.

The Human Trace

One of the qualities I value most in traditional painting is the evidence of human presence.

A painting contains traces of the person who created it. Beneath the visible surface are corrections, changes of mind, moments of confidence and moments of uncertainty. There are brushstrokes that could only have been made by a human hand at a particular moment in time.

When viewers stand in front of an original painting, they are not only looking at an image. They are looking at the result of a process. Every layer, texture and mark is part of a record that documents how the work came into existence.

That physical connection matters to me.

Perhaps it matters even more today than it did in the past.

Technology Is Not the Enemy

None of this means that I reject technology.

I still use digital tools. I still appreciate photography. I still find artificial intelligence fascinating. These innovations have transformed creative work in extraordinary ways, and I have no desire to return to a world without them.

What AI helped me understand was not why technology is wrong, but why certain traditional practices remain valuable.

Technology excels at producing results. Painting reminds me to appreciate the process.

The two ideas can coexist.

Why I Paint Today

People sometimes ask why I returned to painting after spending so many years exploring other visual media.

The answer is simple.

I wanted to create something that could not be generated instantly. I wanted a medium that demanded patience, attention and commitment. I wanted to work with materials that pushed back, surprised me and occasionally refused to cooperate.

Most of all, I wanted to experience the satisfaction of making something with my own hands.

Ironically, it was one of the most advanced technologies of our time that led me back to one of humanity’s oldest artistic traditions.

Not because I reject the future.

But because the future reminded me of the value of creating something slowly, deliberately and one brushstroke at a time.


Part 3 of 3: Why I Returned to Oil Painting in the Age of AI

This article concludes a series of reflections on photography, creativity and the journey that eventually led me back to oil painting.

Part 1: Why I Returned to Oil Painting in the Age of AI
Part 2: From Photography to Oil Painting
Part 3: The Photograph That Never Existed

2 thoughts on “Why I Returned to Oil Painting in the Age of AI”

  1. This really resonated with me. I work in a completely different field, but I have found myself asking the same question lately. Technology keeps making things faster and easier, yet the things that bring the most satisfaction are often the ones that take time and effort. I especially liked the distinction between creating an image and experiencing the process of creation. AI can produce remarkable results, but it cannot replace the feeling of gradually building something with your own hands. Thank you for sharing such an honest perspective.

  2. A thoughtful and refreshing read. I don’t see AI and traditional art as enemies, but I completely understand why many artists are rediscovering the value of physical materials and slower creative processes. Looking forward to seeing where your artistic journey leads next.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *